Fuji GFX50R after a month of use

After using this camera for about four weeks I almost get used to the new format. What are the differences compared to a full frame or aps-c camera? The main difference for me is a physical due to the change in sensor size. You have to stop down to higher aperture values to get everything in focus. This leads to higher ISO values to get a decent shutter speed.

So if you're coming from the aps-c world, you need to update your shooting routine. Despite this change it opens up a whole new world in working with a shallower depth of field when it comes to portraits etc. This means taking environmental portraits with the 63mm lens at a distance (full body portrait) that has that pop out factor. The quality of the resulting images blew me away.

And just to mention it again. The quality of the glass is outstanding. Too less photo fanatics out there are talking about the GF lenses. For your money you get tack sharp lenses (even sharp wide open) that are all weather sealed. Fuji is producing glass without compromises. The price point doubles compared to the aps-c lineup, but there is nothing to complain and let's be honest. Glass stays for a longer time than the body.

The next lens on my list is the GF 100-200 5.6 OIS. I always need a good telephoto lens for travel, landscape etc.

GF63 at f5.6 - with a little pop


GF50 at f8

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why should you buy the new X-PRO2?

Yesterday I sold my Ricoh GR III and traded it for a X100F

The GF 100-200m - first impressions